____________________________________
The report published by the National Reading
Panel was an evidence-based assessment of
the scientific research literature on Reading
and it's implications for reading instruction.
____________________________________
____________________________________
Despite the extensive use of independent reading practices in schools across North America (Report of the National Reading Panel, 2000) the panel could not find any evidence to suggest that independent silent reading in isolation reliably improves reading achievement or reading skills.
At the same time, there is also no evidence to suggest that time set aside for silent reading should be eliminated from instructional time altogether. In a recent article by called Reconsidering Silent Reading (featured on LD Online, 2011), the author encourages educators to revisit silent reading programs and consider how they are both implemented, and supplemented with other activities, to increase their value to student reading achievement.
Outlined in the article are some important classroom conditions taken from the book Revisiting Silent Reading: New Directions for Teachers and Researchers by Hiebert and Reutzel (2010) that will improve the practice of silent reading in classrooms. Their suggestions include:
- Allow students to select their own reading material.
- Students should be engaged in silent reading and remain on-task.
- Ensure students are held accountable for what they are reading and understanding.
- Silent Reading Programs should include time for interaction and feedback.
Students should be engaged in silent reading and remain on-task. Students should understand that silent reading time is time to practice their reading skills. Over time, students should be working to increase their capacity to remain in silent reading tasks for longer durations, and should be actively working to improve specific reading skills.
Ensure students are held accountable for what they are reading and understanding. Students should be held accountable for the time spent in silent reading activities. The method of accountability should be quick, easy, and straight forward, and can even provide evidence of whether or not certain skills, such as stamina, are improving.
Silent Reading Programs should include time for interaction and feedback. Conversations and interactions between students, and between student and teacher should be encouraged, planned for, and supported. While modelling good reading habits is important, engaging in DEAR at the same as your students may not be time well spent. Engaging students in conversation about what they are reading may better support their developing reading skills.
For more information on how to support your students in your silent reading program, consider becoming familiar with Reutzel, Jones and Newman Scaffolded Silent Reading approach (2010). See Exploring Scaffolded Silent Reading, or Scaffolded Silent Reading, or this search results page.
____________________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment